On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-allen-anti-circumcision-activists-20120812,0,2269752.story … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
-
Replying to @DrChaya
Hi again. I was going to drop this, but since you are still tweeting about it
I just want to leave this right here. This page does a good job of summing of some of the anatomical point intactivists make regarding physical benefits of keeping foreskin:https://www.foregen.org/human_foreskin 4 replies . 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @crypto_spawn @DrChaya
Dude, I don't care if you have a limp noodle! No woman gives a damn about some psychosexual male dysfunction or dysphoria! Just not on our top 10 list. Our entire world caters to men and a sad handful of individuals are still not able to make a go of it. TFB- sucks to be them
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MerolaGeraldine @DrChaya
My noodle is not limp. Fortunately my issues are not as severe as others. In my case I have noticed a degree of lost sensitivity in my gland I have aged, because it has not been protected by the foreskin which is present on uncircumcised men.
3 replies . 0 retweets 0 likes
research does not support your claim. see the slate article I posted. No difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.