Hi again. I was going to drop this, but since you are still tweeting about it
I just want to leave this right here. This page does a good job of summing of some of the anatomical point intactivists make regarding physical benefits of keeping foreskin:https://www.foregen.org/human_foreskin
-
-
-
On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://latimes.com/la-oe-allen-an … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
https://circumcisionmovie.com does an excellent job pointing flaws in medical studies w respect to sensitivity, and it’s not wrong to see this as a human rights issue
-
propaganda piece with no actual science. See slate article I posted.
-
Little basis in fact? I was circumcised at 13 years old and the level of sensation was decreased in a dramatic and irreparable way from before being circumcised. At least I had the ability to consent to the the medically necessary procedure (in my case), unlike infants.
-
that flies in the face of several studies that were done comparing circumcised and uncircumcised men that found no differences in sensation
-
Are you stating that my experience is falsified in some way?
-
no just anecdotal.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No kids or penis here but I find circumcision, without a religious reason, to be an odd thing to do. Why would we make a permanent decision like this for someone else?
-
I am not going to get into that debate. I had said when the 'intactivists' invaded my thread on WOMEN and sexual dysfunction that I am JEWISH and got attacked for that in an amazing display of anti-semitism. Regardless the whole movement is based in
#AntiScience bull -
Speaking of anti-science, you are displaying an incredible amount of it. And PS, using your religion as a shield shows how dishonest you are. Plenty of Jews want to end the barbaric practice as well.
-
Go figure, Dr. Anti-science blocked me for pointing out she's being a disingenuous and lying twit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The most adamant people I know on this issue are women...I can't figure it out
-
just posting the facts after being attacked for posting about WOMEN's dyspareunia post partum
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I thought all men were obsessed with the penis, even when it just hangs there.
-
yes but apparently this group, they blame their sexual dysfunction on their circumcision ergo their parents even though several studies refute the argument
-
Wouldn't the one who also did the cutting and tries to justify it and mocks their concerns also play a role?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I suspect this whole circumcision discussion and the "bathroom bill" is a distraction thread for the Russian Troll farms. It's designed to divert focus off our goal of WOMEN'S RIGHTS: right to choose, childcare, equal pay, and paid maternity leave. Everything else is a sideshow
-
Interesting point. But the anti-circumcision foreskin fetishists are also very anti-science like the anti-vac'ers and climate change deniers. They refuse to acknowledge the medical/health benefits of a circumcised penis.
-
Here you go mate, have some science:http://archive.vn/00p77
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.