The Special Misogyny Reserved for Mothers https://nyti.ms/2RmHBjH Male sexual dysfunction not taboo but women's is? & women's from GIVING BIRTH? What kind of society are we? As a physician and mother these are crucial topics I address in the office regularly. Nothing taboo. #sex
-
-
Viagra is for symptoms. Do you endorse male genital mutilation as a practice? If not, please speak out against it. It is utterly barbaric and has no place in modern society, as we have already figured out about FGM. The effects are tremendously negative and damaging
-
I am Jewish. My sons were circumcised. I have also seen boys who were NOT circumcised get infections requiring circumcision later (when it is painful). Circumcision lowers the rate of HIV and other STD transmission. It is not without benefits.
-
That you would put FGM and circumcision in the same breath is astounding. FGM removes the clitoris. Circumcision does not remove the penis. Get over it.
-
It's not astounding at all because SOME forms remove the clitoris and others do not. There are forms that are less invasive than MGM.
-
thanks for proving the point of the original thread about WOMEN and MISOGYNY - it is alive and well - bye
-
That's completely nonsensical.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Right Viagra. a drug where 47% of it is used in the USA, a country with only 4% of the world's population, but the vast majority of it's infant circumcisions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be a religious Jew & practice medicine immediately puts you in a state of a conflict of interest. Your belief in the Covenant would put you in an ethical bind. You should recuse yourself from any post natal paediatric care that might involve discussions surrounding MGM.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How come Viagra does not sell in Scandinavia?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyYbFZneCC4 …
-
Scandinavia is not a country.
-
It's three countries, but it doesn't have a market in any of them. It may have something to do with the fact that circumcised men are 453% more likely to develop erectile dysfunction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry, you think that removing the external part of a clitoris is more damaging that removing a frenulum with the attached foreskin? I'll grant that infibulation is worse, but clitederectomies? Not sure about that... How about pricking the clitoral hood?
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Men are mocked fir needing viagra, and we can't talk about WHY it's so popular. Circumcised men need it far more often than uncirmucised men.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Viagra ads are on TV therefore we don't live in a society where the mutilation of baby boys is not only considered normal but celebrated by political hopefuls" The internet never forgets, Cathy. Good luck campaigning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.