Unless your implication is that she's wrong, not sure what this is except a criticism of their reporting.
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Keep up the great work. Crack squad of reporters you have there. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Guess they aren't keen to receive death threats.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah but the fact that second hand one was very similar in detail and contemporous is significant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They would have to be willing to enter into this political maelstrom. Not many people want to do that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What doesn't seem odd is your grasping at straws.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good thing we weren't relying on whinging like this during Watergate. "Seems odd that only the WaPo could suss this out and not my paper."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah man, odd that the wealthy, insulated class that has operated without any regard to possible consequences for their actions for centuries would not be quick to expose their social class as the home of debased vampires that it is. Hella odd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.