It’s driving me nuts !pic.twitter.com/f5yEu3K4kf
Putting my trial lawyer/pundit hat on now: There are multiple jurors who believe the defendant is guilty as charged but disapprove of the sentence that awaits him so they’re voting to acquit the defendant who they believe is guilty as charged. Not how this is supposed to work. 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And once they let him off the hook they’ll never mention that it was wrong again. Suddenly, he’ll be the perfect President again as he campaigns for reelection.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need the revelant witnesses
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nor would they ever give him a lesser sentence, like a censure (not that he doesn't fully deserve remove, but point is, they wouldn't even do that... they'll let him skate instead).
-
Someone used the anology someone is caught robbing a bank; he/she is told they can keep the money, and told thet should never do it again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In this Dr. Seuss world we live in now, where up is down and down is up...yes!pic.twitter.com/LAZfXBMtk6
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Makes no sense, Doug.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And many of those are up for reelection in November so we the people will
#VoteThemOut2020Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well remember, calling witnesses may have helped them understand the depth of the crime more but, nah!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.