Nobody is "crying about someone treating a fictional character badly". We're condemning a person for using a video game to promote violence against feminists (see the title of the original video and the comments) and how this is a much broader issue.
-
-
Replying to @DouggieJones @Blaze33405 and
What's naive is doubling down on this uncritical insistence that because something is fiction, it can't be used in a damaging way. Would you extend that rationale to religious texts and the wars waged on the backs of them? If not, then you're being inconsistent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DouggieJones @Blaze33405 and
The problem isn't the work of fiction itself, it's the person who is using that work of fiction to spread a particular message to an audience who are clearly stirred up by it. This is a condemnation of one person based on their actions. Not anything to do with gaming specifically
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DouggieJones @Blaze33405 and
The people really "crying" is this guy for getting booted off of a platform for perpetuating what clearly violates YouTube's terms of service.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DouggieJones @Blaze33405 and
There are literally gta v montages of Narco songs honoring the life of drugdealers and murderers and youtube doesn't do anything about it, this video, as unpleseant as you may have found it, was NOT taken due the violation of YT terms
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HideousMistake @Blaze33405 and
Then complain about it to YouTube instead of getting onto them for correctly flagging a video that does violate their terms of service. (P.S., honouring murderers or glourifying them isn't the same as advocating for political violence).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DouggieJones @HideousMistake and
Violence be it political or otherwise is bad. No one's arguing this. Problem is you seem to think it's okay to take someone down over "political violence" yet we see genocide and mass killings often yet no one bats an eye.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Blaze33405 @DouggieJones and
It's why I bring up Jack Thompson. Just like his case, yours is as moot and idiotic since the sane understand it's just a game and we don't take these things seriously because they are games.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Blaze33405 @HideousMistake and
Keep going through life thinking that a guy promoting a video of him killing a feminist in a game on YouTube has no political connotations or real-world affects because it's "just a game". And keep making false equivalencies to Jack Thompson. I won't stop you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DouggieJones @HideousMistake and
I'll keep doing that. I have no issue bring up the man to counter this case because it is relevant to how ridiculous it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Jack Thompson wanted to ban all violent games. Stop being a jackass and making false comparisons between him and people critical of aspects of gaming generally. You look like a reactionary and thoughtless person when you do that.
-
-
Replying to @DouggieJones @HideousMistake and
His argument points went in the same route you are going in order to justify someone losing their channel. Come back to reality son.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.