-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ummm, i don't think this is helpful Junior.
-
Yes, other than this I promise there was no attempt to collude whatsoever. Oh look, a squirrel.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wonder if they'll call you a "good boy" in prison.
-
You're literally publishing proof that you and Wikileaks engaged in a mutually-beneficial relationship. The fact that you think this is exculpatory is hilarious.
-
You needed info from them, so you asked. You tweeted a link because they asked you too. What else did you do that they asked?
-
Did you do anything to help them "improve the perception of [their] impartiality" or otherwise benefit them?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For the Democrats & liberals screaming with delight that this shows collusion. You guys better take two Blamitol & find a safe space. A guilty person doesn’t put emails out on twitter. Let’s see the 33,000 Clinton emails, oops! she deleted them! She’s guilty

-
A story quoting them was published before Junior posted anything. This isn't disclosure, it's a moron's idea of damage control.
-
Not cleaver like the Obama admin & his gang of criminals, that’s true

-
You appear to be under the mistaken impression that weak deflection has some persuasive value.
-
Well you know nothing about me. It would be nice if that were the case. I only know what is right & wrong. I saw an admin that really colluded with Russia. The MSM, Dems, libs & Hollywood said nothing. Now after 11 months Mueller’s got Maniford on taxes. The other kids on lying

-
I know of you only what you've posted in this thread. So I know you wish to avoid any discussion of Trump's wrongdoing through deflection, while perpetuating falsehoods about Obama and HC. Carry on.
-
That’s the trouble you think Obama was the greatest President & I think not. My point of views will never align with yours. I’m sure you love this country as much as I do. So at least that’s our commonality as Americans nice talking to you & for being civil

-
I haven't expressed any thoughts on Obama's presidency. One day soon the light will go on for you about Trump. Have your sunglasses ready.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Could you imagine how illegal it would be to expose clintbama crimes if clinton had won the election?
-
Republican Exposing corruption differs from democrats opposition research in that exposing corruption is facts, opposition research is lies
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.