Stating clearly: 1. What you are arguing for specifically. 2. What you think of the incel movement. 3. What your purpose was in writing the article. Would all be good. All three were unclear to me to say the least, assuming you didn't mean to present incel sympathetically.https://twitter.com/DouthatNYT/status/991739548269973504 …
I thought his thesis was pretty clearly that sexual modernity leads to legal prostitution, the incel movement, and sex redistribution so we shouldn't have it. The trouble is that a ton of people read it differently.
-
-
Although re: #2 his denunciation of the incels did seem a bit unenthusiastic to me.
-
To say the least.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.