Today has generated a lot of questions and confusion. We know it hasn't been easy for everyone. Going forward, we'll be taking a closer look at our own harassment policies, with the aim to update them. Our thoughts and plans:https://yt.be/help/zxSq
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube
“For harassment, we look at whether the purpose of the video is to incite harassment, threaten or humiliate an individual” well if that’s the case then the late night hosts & SNL (Who you sell premium ad roll & promote) would be banned as they’ve been dunking on same ppl for yrs
16 replies 20 retweets 472 likes -
Replying to @East_ @TeamYouTube
Calling someone a lispy queer with no other 'joke' attached is very different from political satire or a comedy sketch. Though I personally don't find SNL funny, surely you can see that there's a pretty clear difference between what they do and what Crowder did
1 reply 1 retweet 21 likes -
Crowder is also a comedian, much like SNL you might not find him funny, but others do.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Right, but if your joke is just calling a gay guy a queer than you ain't much of a comedian
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
The skill of the comedian and quality of the joke are irrelevant, otherwise most comedians on YouTube would already be banned.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It's not about skill, it's about whether he's just using 'comedy' as a cover for harassing this guy
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
If your idea of a joke is calling the PotUS an orange moron I don't find you very funny either. Jokes are subjective and no one gets to decide what another finds funny. So it's a poor argument at best Re: Jokes.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.