and aren't your exported files tiny compared to the raw footage?
-
-
(hi from the national association of broadcasters conference)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Dogen
I played with their new one; it kicks ass (esp. in low light) but isn't out until september
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Dogen
_nobody_ has a 12-bit monitor, everybody just dithers down to 10 or 8 you record in a higher sample depth to give more room for error in compression and editing (same reason you would want to record audio at >48kHz for music mastering when you distribute at 44.1)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @11rcombs
Ah interesting, thanks for the information. Any thoughts on the image / quality in general?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dogen
definitely much better sensitivity than their previous cams; ISO goes up to 25600, and there's much less grain now
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @11rcombs
Really love the look of the current camera, so it caught my attention. Audio inputs are enticing as well. Do you think XLR makes a bit difference?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dogen
theoretically, with the right mics and adapters, you can sound fine on 3.5mm, but the mini-XLR should make that easier. I haven't seen the output of the built-in recorder, though, and on-camera audio is usually thought of as a "scratch track"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Got it. I thought it could solve my sync issues haha
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.