The ONLY way to combat “anti-vac” is with mortality or hard endpoint data … and we live in a world where this is possible to do, it’s just expensive and time consuming. Doctors are fighting other doctors instead of mandating amazing data to rely upon for advocating for vac use
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This sure seems like an unusual reaction to DTAPpic.twitter.com/RGbOIf2NXb
-
The UK version for covid specifically had “sudden increase in wealth” listed as an adverse reaction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
So I searched on this story, cannot find any verification of it. The original post seems to be gone. There are news stories of people who pass a day or two later, but they actually were diagnosed with Covid. If you have an original source and coroner’s report, please share
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How can you “rely” on VAERS data in that way at all? It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what the data is and bad science. You can say that data doesn’t exist, but to twist VAERS data in to something it isn’t = bad medicine and bad science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No we didn’t, you just don’t understand how VAERS works. Or you do, but it serves your purposes to misrepresent it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Lost 150lbs |
Co-Host of
24-Week Program for Weight Loss |
Married to
Nicer In Real Life