So instead of publishing papers with opposing ideas you believe that the Lancet should take a stance on specific issues and not publish anything that disagrees with that stance? That’s an unbiased approach to have
Before the Lancet published their anti-meat, anti-dairy diet, they published this... ”Those eating the highest levels of dairy and red meat saw their chances of early death fall by 25 per cent and a fatal heart attack cut by 22 per cent.”https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/food/eat/new-study-says-eating-meat-and-cheese-is-good-for-you/news-story/ab57e0b5fa5209dfcdfd5eb5b90113be …
-
-
-
There’s opposing views and then there’s agendas...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s why Hong Kong has the highest life expectancy. Did you know the Japanese ate more meat than Americans, are the #1 eggs eaters, and fish eaters? No wonder the Japs are number 2 in life expectancy.
#yes2meatpic.twitter.com/yN5jaXBYjB
-
http://truther10.blogspot.com/2016/06/hong-kong-world-longest-life-expectancy.html … Average daily egg consumption, by weight in grams, per person: Japan 52 (world highest) Hong Kong 38 USA 38 South Korea 30 World 24
#yes2meat#YesToMeat
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please! That's so old-news, so 2018. And so peer-reviewed. Yech! Get with
@TheLancet's new program: We're doing what nutrition science has done for years--following the money!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We have a saying in the UK about getting two specific body parts confused. The “elbow” wrote this article, whereas the EAT guidelines came out of the other one.
-
Arm ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In other words, before funding became an issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ok but cured processed meat (shown in the picture) is not the same as fresh meat
-
Yes, and some not so good
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wonder what
@rosestant70 would say about this?#yes2meat#meatheals#veganlies#plantbasedpropagandaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Chew on this
#EATLancet@TheLancet@LancetGH@TheLancetPH
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Before they saw the pound signs in front of their eyes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wow that looks just like what the Sardinians, in the blue zone, eat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
they ARE a confused bunch
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Check the study backers first always
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do I retweet this 100000000 times over?!??!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
didn’t source the study
-
Yes they did
-
No... no links to the study
-
It's part of the PURE studies, but I don't know which one. Could be unpublished. This hits pretty close to home: "total fat and each type of fat was associated with lower risk of total mortality (quintile 5 vs quintile 1, total fat: HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·67–0·87], p trend<0·0001"
-
It really depends on the study and how the data was collected / if it was taken over x number of years
-
I think this one's more accurate than all of those food questionares, where you ask people what they 'think' they ate last. Then wait a couple decades, track outcomes and somehow try to extrapolate data from it all.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.