The last two I can understand: there is intentional "fail closed" logic in seccomp in those cases. Losing TIF_SECCOMP, though, I'd expect would instantly bypass seccomp. What actually goes wrong if only that is changed? (Also, I assume you unset NNP too?)
-
-
-
You are right but I also need to stop copying on fork()
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.