Journalists used to provide distribution, so they were pandered to. Now they simply provide distortion, so they're ignored. To the formerly pandered, indifference feels like defensiveness, when it's merely the ingratiating mask falling off.https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/uncanny-valley-author-techs-response-to-criticism-is-getting-incredibly-defensive-132406677.html …
-
-
Odgovor korisniku/ci @antoniogm
Great observation. I will also add Gell-Mann amnesia for my lack of trust: "the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues... read as if the rest of the newspaper was more accurate about... than the baloney you just read."https://www.epsilontheory.com/gell-mann-amnesia/ …
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
Dinesh Kulkarni je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceBalaji S. Srinivasan
And another reminder of the variety of errors in journalists' analysis. Most readers are not that critical most of the time and bad news propagates because of that:https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1223088081777065985 …
Dinesh Kulkarni je dodan/na,
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.