Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
DexGShep's profile
Dex G Shep
Dex G Shep
Dex G Shep
@DexGShep

Tweets

Dex G Shep

@DexGShep

Male | 41 | Furry | Kinky | Bondagey | Sniffy | Gymmy | Pokery | In an open master/pet relationship with @HexJonson | After Dark: @DexGShepAD

Central Illinois
Joined December 2016

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 7
      Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

      Which was later criticized/debunked in a systematic review study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23749001  And one that shows how it confused the data: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610340 

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 7
      Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

      I see nothing in either of the links you provided that actually debunks the study that I linked.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 8
      Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

      The first study: Speculative assertions that the removal of fine-touch neuroreceptors of the foreskin, reorganization/atrophy of neural circuitry and keratinisation of the glans penis as a result of circumcision might lower sensitivity and lead to sexual dysfunction-

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 8
      Replying to @aimlesslytrying @DexGShep and

      8,15,16,17 have been refuted by the American Academy of Pediatrics and through evaluations by experts of such reports.14,18,19,20,21,22.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 10
      Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

      Following the citations, 16 is the study I linked, and 18 is the only citation I see that attempts to refute it. 18 is not a study; it is an opinion piece by B. Morris & J. Waskett, who are not doctors but are known to have a pro-genital-cutting bias. It is not a credible source.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 10
      Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

      The study that you linked tried to prove ideas and assumptions that has already been debunked by other studies. Nope 18 is a study, it have citations of different studies, shows a clear methodology of their findings, and etc. Just because you don't understand/like it, doesn't-

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 10
      Replying to @aimlesslytrying @DexGShep and

      -mean it's not a study. Morris worked in medical science and you don't have to be a doctor to make conclusive data. Waskett is the same, since he still provide conclusive data for his research. You haven't shown how these studies are wrong, but you don't trust them

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 10
      Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

      Actually, when discussing the "circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" conclusion, they didn't dispute the data; instead, they gave their opinions on why they think the data, as measured, shouldn't matter. They gave no data of their own.

      2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    9. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 10
      Replying to @DexGShep @aimlesslytrying and

      And of course I don't trust them, because it would be silly to trust pro-genital-cutting opinion pieces written by people who have a known pro-genital-cutting bias.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 10
      Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

      It doesn't matter their bias, as long they have good data. Pro-vaccinations studies are littered with people who was for vaccines, yet no one bats an eye because they have actual evidence. Biases is study is not rare or new, that's why we rate the actual evidence presented.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 10
      Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

      Exactly...and the actual evidence presented demonstrates that circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis. The opinion paper cited does not present actual evidence to the contrary, only the opinions of people who have a known pro-genital-cutting bias.

      9:11 PM - 10 Oct 2018
      • 1 Like
      • ProtectChildren
      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Williams ✝‏ @aimlesslytrying Oct 10
          Replying to @DexGShep @dkingpower7 and

          So wouldn't cut men sensitivity be lowered? If the "evidence" say that cut men lost their most sensitive part of their penis, then studies where it shows sensitivity to be the same with uncut shouldn't exist.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Dex G Shep‏ @DexGShep Oct 10
          Replying to @aimlesslytrying @dkingpower7 and

          I've yet to see a study that presents actual evidence in the form of objective sensitivity measurements (not a survey or some other subjective way) that shows no sensitivity difference in men who were cut as infants vs. intact men. If you know of any, I'd be happy to read them.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. TheRazzleDazzleMommy‏ @razzdazzmomblog Oct 10
          Replying to @DexGShep @aimlesslytrying and

          https://therazzledazzlemommy.blog/2018/07/04/soraya-mire-fmg-survivor-author-and-human-rights-activist-raising-a-baby-activist/ …

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info