Dear Warhammer Tactics People, My name is Aaron. I am well. I hope you are also well. I have a request and an explanation. And obviously, "playing the game" answers a lot of what's in this thread. That goes without saying. We already do that. You, me, and everyone else. 1/?
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
I'm more curious about countering a trend in (some!) video guides, as well as the repetitive answers on social media to those "What units should I take?" questions from newbies. I think we're letting peeps down a lot, here.
5 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 112 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
What My Friends Do: Use units that look cool, matching our army themes and preferred tactics, tied into lore we love. What We Don't Do: Copy cookie-cutter lists off the internet and lovingly-slash-sadistically hone them to tournament-ripe perfection. How we play isn't unique.
3 odpowiedzi 2 podane dalej 190 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Plenty of tactics videos, and online discussion of army lists, immediately dives into what's "best". The "strongest" unit. The special character you take instead of the "weaker" generic character. The "auto-take" artefact. I'd argue this is of limited use in, like, reality.
3 odpowiedzi 2 podane dalej 149 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Relaying that stuff proves you can read tournament tables, which is great, or anticipate them, which is nothing to be sneezed at. That's a damn craft in itself. No argument. But it's useless for actual tactics and deeper discussion. And it swallows pretty much all other debate.
2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 116 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Tell me why I should take unit A, B, and C, not just X. What are they good at? Oh, they're not "optimal"? Cool, great, but what ARE they good at? What are they bad at? In what kind of army would you take that unit? What special rule is that unit strong against, and weak against?
3 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 149 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Don't tell me to take one "best" subfaction and ignore the others. Plenty of normal, actual people do fine with those subfactions. Tell me what they're good at, and how to play them better than I currently do. Y'know... tactics!
2 odpowiedzi 2 podane dalej 130 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Don't tell me 1 artefact is "auto-include" and then move on. Tell me what the other 30 in the battletome ARE good for. Tell me what cool Realm artefacts would go with different Enclaves/Lodges/Legions/Tribes, etc. Tell me what your lore-appropriate armies might look like.
5 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 123 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Answering those questions proves insight, understanding, and depth of tactical knowledge. Copy/Pasting "30 eels led by the king of an entire species - and don't forget Cloud of Midnight on the Soulscryer" again & again does not. I know we've all seen it. I'm saying nothing new.
10 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 137 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Shout-out to
@HonestWargamer (stay hydrated
), @AnthonyMagro,@tough_up, and@goonhammer, who consistently do awesome work on this. If you know any others, please list them here so I can follow them. I'm looking for more voices that expand on the discussion. Thank you! /fin49 odpowiedzi 3 podane dalej 227 polubionychPokaż ten wątek
Amen.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.