Nobody has an unlimited capacity to help. The fact that you’re spending your capacity on someone like Stallman, rather than, say, indigenous climate activists priced out of the cities where they do their lobbying? Says a lot about the type of behavior you want to see more of.
-
-
Even now after experiencing serious consequences there is not the slightest sign of understanding, remorse or change. Why do you advocate to continue letting him get away with harming others due to his position?
-
I haven't seen anyone advocate for letting him continue to harm folks.
-
Anyone being homeless is bad and a serious flaw in the system. But this is victim blaming and advocating to not set boundaries and consequences upon someone who harms you and others.
-
This is a super shitty take, I agree, but it does not advocate letting him harm people.
-
It is, because it blames the person who called out the harmful actions. It's just another way to say: "you shouldn't have called out this in that way, look how he's suffering now!" The only alternative to calling out is to let him continue, if you accept a 30y experiment as proof
-
If you believe that the only options are: 1. Massive mob destroys an an autistic old man barely surviving. 2. Let him continue writing emails. Then that’s black and white thinking and that’s what fascists do. Progressive people understand nuance and context and don’t harm.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There was a distinct lack of muck to rake on Stallman so much a main antagonist put forward the "emacs vigin" joke as damning evidence. Someone complained and he removed the sexist joke. This was evidence that Stallman was beyond reform.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
| Compassionate Code,