I think you just have a dogmatic bone to pick with other disciplines tbh.
-
-
Replying to @Depopulatus @dcxtv
you can't ignore the fact that one of the surest signs of cranks in science is that they are "interdisciplinary"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Locus_of_Ctrl @dcxtv
OK…? What a mistake for evolutionary theory to penetrate medicine!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
but yeah -- i would agree that eugenics was a dramatic failure. so i presume that's a score towards my side there...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Locus_of_Ctrl @dcxtv
What I’m saying is, nonlinearity is a physics concept and it has infiltrated biology and gotten rid of notions of advancing up a chain of progress. I have no idea why you think this is controversial.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Depopulatus @dcxtv
no serious biologist claims things are advancing in a chain of progress. The "ascent of man" is a caricature. Even Darwin didn't think this way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it seems that you're trying to claim advances in biology to your occultish physics-magic thing and it's rather annoying to watch from outside.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Depopulatus @dcxtv
what is "this" referring to in your tweet above
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That advances in biology partially stem from dynamical systems theory and other nonlinear physics.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
