It's a "complex" of claims, some of which are metaphysical, others are physical.
Because you don’t know anything about what you’re trying to say and De Landa will help you.
-
-
oh but u know things when u claim Darwinism is teleological? Explain how
-
Darwinism isn’t teleological. In the 19th century, classical Darwinism and classical thermodynamics posited single historical outcomes. This is not the case any longer.
-
> In the 19th century, classical Darwinism and classical thermodynamics posited single historical outcomes. wrong wrong wrong. Read Darwin, Hamilton, Wilson, then come back
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.