It's incredible that people actually think that Deleuze has new insight to add to Darwinism.
What Deleuze did was (1) discover a deeper phylum common to all things, and (2) render scientific law impossible while preserving objective knowledge. He didn’t “update” Darwin in the sense of adding knowledge or theory. He transformed Darwin’s world.
-
-
this is wrong sorry, he didn't discover any phylum, his concepts are fuzzy, his tools are blunt, reading it makes any Darwinist vomit
-
This might be because you haven’t grasped Prigogine and the revolutions in 20th c physics. You’re also retconning Darwin to reflect later things, like nonequilibrium dynamics. Also, has anyone posited that Deleuze has updated the body of knowledge of biology?
-
he makes claims that touch upon biology. those claims also happen to be (mostly) wrong
-
Well, that’s convincing!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.