Non-peer-reviewed manuscript incorrectly claims natural cloud changes explain global warming Many blogs covered this paper without any factchecking (incl. Infowars, Zerohedge, wattsupwiththat, Sputnik, RT, NaturalNews...) Scientists' review:https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/non-peer-reviewed-manuscript-falsely-claims-natural-cloud-changes-can-explain-global-warming/ …
Science is consensus, you can't just pick the guys you like. It's not sports team. Youtube is not peer reviewed literature. Internet enables fake prophets. Not all scientists are climatologists. There's your "get out of denial" starter pack.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


