Luca Dellanna

@DellAnnaLuca

Author and independent researcher on emergent behavior • My books & my research: • Disclaimer:

Turin   & Singapore
Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @DellAnnaLuca

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @DellAnnaLuca

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    28. stu 2019.

    THE CONTROL HEURISTIC, 2ND EDITION (thread)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 2 sata

    They weren’t contributing to the conversation. You can check them using the button “show hidden replies”.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 4 sata

    If battery performance degrades as part of a software update, it’s not covered by warranty anymore. That’s a way to make retroactive warranty updates to cover recent reliability problems, I guess.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    I love Super Bowl statistics. (“No team that has failed to convert at least 35% of their 3rd downs has gone on to win” etc.) They are the best introduction to p-hacking that can be found outside major journals.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I believe you're exactly right. Consider what 'circuit breakers' do: they stop the activity right away, then allow time to figure what's happening. Trading floor, electrical grids, your home electrical system, etc. , even at various scales it works.

    Poništi
  6. 2. velj

    The 5 top thoughts I encountered this week:

    Poništi
  7. 2. velj

    I've only been through 1.5 essays of this list, but they've been wonderful so far. Wonderful. Here goes my Sunday evening.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This is long but brilliantly written and endlessly fascinating: all the more so since it seems this was a colossal unintended consequence. HT Piece by

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 2. velj

    I’d add that the point here is cospicuosity. If everyone knows that everyone else is using videoconferences: - meetings are more likely to be requested* - govs are more likely to restrict travel (*): I know, face-to-face meeting are also a costly signal of long-term commitment

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    This is actually a huge underestimate, in one sense - H1N1 didn't go away, and is currently a seasonal influenza strain accounting for ~50% of 2019-2020 flu cases. Fairly mild but scary novel diseases don't usually go away, they become routine, are endemic, and get forgotten.

    Poništi
  12. 2. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    One key long-term shift: from using the institutions to determine the nature of emergencies, to use emergencies to determine the nature of institutions.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    “The job of science is to try and be right, the job of a business is to be less wrong than your competitors.” joins us on the premiere episode of season two of

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 2. velj

    "The boundaries of the consequences of our actions recently extended to the boundaries of our environment." New post 💡: New Values for a Connected World

    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    Great point! Sign-up here so that you can read me even if I get silenced 😉

    Poništi
  17. 2. velj

    In particular, the advantage comes not only from having an infrastructure to manage business disruptions – any company is free to sign-up today, post-hoc – but in having it already in place so that there are less incentives pressuring governments not to enforce travel bans.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 2. velj

    This idea – the government investing in videoconferencing instead or in addition to high-speed transportation – seems in retrospect a sensible idea in case movement of people has to be restricted for, say, a pandemic.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    WHO is dangerous. Idiots like this are dangerous. They are asking you to ignore germ theory. THEY are anti-science.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Based on the content of my mentions, I feel like I need to further debunk crazy / HIV conspiracy preprint. This is a thread doing so. 1/9

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 2. velj

    7/ (The lag data used here, I found on multiple sources on the internet. It might or might not correspond to the real one; in any case, our samples are too small for now to say. The point of this thread is not to produce exact numbers, but to raise awareness about a phenomenon.)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·