(actually, thread after I do a quick stand-up meeting, please hold)
-
-
Show this thread
-
Okay, back. So, I have, over the course of my career at this point, interviewed probably 80-100 prospective hires for various game creative positions. Most of them were writers/designers, but sometimes I was a Representative From Another Team for artists, sound people, etc.
Show this thread -
I've also worked with hundreds of game designers. None of the really great ones had a game design degree (this is not saying that it's a bad thing, but that there is a caveat there). One of the greats was a former standup comedian. One was a former architect.
Show this thread -
One was a former music producer. Heck, I co-hosted a podcast with Richard Garfield for a while. And I assure you that in addition to being one of the greatest game designers out there, he is very much a math professor.
Show this thread -
And over the past 5 or so years, there have been a lot of candidates from game design/animation/etc. programs. And--not across the board, but definitely as a trend--when I'd ask them their favorite book, they couldn't name one.
Show this thread -
We had a round of candidates for a cinematics director position. So, basically who directs our mini-movies in the game. Only one of the candidates was able to name a favorite movie director. It was Michael Bay.
Show this thread -
We had animation candidates who couldn't name a favorite animator. We had environmental artists who couldn't name a favorite style of architecture or type of biome.
Show this thread -
Their entire field of reference was other games, sometimes anime and manga. Sometimes movies, but not *critically.* They had trouble articulating what creative choices they liked about particular movies.
Show this thread -
And that's a BIG problem. Because games haven't been around that long. Like, whatever creative field you work in, you should be drawing inspiration from outside it. But that's doubly true for games, because there's *not that much to draw from.*
Show this thread -
Game cinematics haven't really developed their own language yet: they're still mostly cribbing from movies. So when other games are your examples for how to do a cinematic, you're deriving from something that's already derivative.
Show this thread -
And--while I'd like to see the visual language of games evolve to be something different than that of movies--at this point, they're mostly just doing what movies do but not as well. If you're a cinematics director or lead and haven't studied film, that's a problem.
Show this thread -
And before I get accused of elitism here, I'm not saying you have to go to college and take film crit classes. There's a lot of solid film crit going on on YouTube. I don't mean movie reviews. I mean *analysis*. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scmHVYYZZ3w …
Show this thread -
Here's a great introduction to camera movements and angles. https://wolfcrow.com/15-essential-camera-shots-angles-and-movements/ …
Show this thread -
Here's a short, easy primer on what we're even talking about when we talk about the "visual language" of film.https://www.videomaker.com/article/c18/18140-visual-language-using-language-as-cinematic-structure …
Show this thread -
So I don't think you have to be formally educated to be good at this stuff. I don't think you need a film degree to be a good cinematics animator or even director. But I do think you need to be *curious* and you need to be *analytical.*
Show this thread -
I mean, that's what I've always screened for in interviews. Not experience. Not *vocabulary*--knowing the terminology is helpful, but you can learn it on the job and insisting someone know it coming in gatekeeps out a lot of people from different backgrounds.
Show this thread -
But what has to be there for me to give someone even a soft yes as a potential hire is that curiosity and that desire to analyze. If you love a particular game, I need you to be able to tell me *why.* To have thought about the decisions that went into it.
Show this thread -
Because you can teach technical skills. You can teach vocabulary. You can teach process. You can't teach curiosity.
Show this thread -
And you can teach *types* of analysis. You can show people different frames for it. You can give them new questions to ask. But wanting to understand *how* something was made and *why,* wanting to get inside the heads of the people that made it--you can't make someone do that.
Show this thread -
When it comes to things like the clothes characters wear in game art--if we're talking video games, though I was initially talking tabletop games, where the art isn't animated and there are no limits on what the clothes can look like--there are limitations to the tech.
Show this thread -
And that's a driver in just looking to what's been done before for inspiration. But that's also a cop-out. Part of being a creative in video games is never having the resources/tech to make what you imagine, and figuring out how to stretch things to get closer.
Show this thread -
But it's also that if, as a creative, you're not going down rabbit holes for inspiration from the real world for how your fictional world works, you're not doing your job. You're there to manifest imagination, and to do that, you need to *feed* it.
Show this thread -
As one of my mentors, Jordan Weisman, used to say repeatedly: when you're working in fantasy/scifi, you need to emphasize the familiar so people can appreciate the exotic.
Show this thread -
And that's partially about giving people touchstones so they're not completely unmoored in your world, but it's also about you figuring out some of the mundane aspects of how your world works. If you're designing a city, go down some urban planning rabbitholes.
Show this thread -
Hell, make your imagined visuals *concrete.* When I was working on Pathfinder, we had a country called Nidal. It was described as sophisticated, glittering, yet colorless and ghostly. Super-refined aesthetics, but both cruel and washed out.
Show this thread -
So I went and made a fashion Pinterest board from it, because if I ended up having to do the art order for a book on it, and *hadn't* bothered to manifest more than a vague mental image, we were going to end up with faux-medieval, but in gray.https://www.pinterest.com/delafina/nidal/
Show this thread -
Something I've tried to emphasize everywhere I've worked is that *everything in your game tells a story.* Down to the menu design and language. And if you're not intentionally telling stories with those elements, you're telling stories unintentionally.
Show this thread -
And that often means different elements end up telling stories that are at cross-purposes. So you don't need an architecture degree. But you do need to go spend an hour reading some basic intros to major *concepts* in architecture...
Show this thread -
...so that you know how people actually move through buildings, how we use them, what decisions in building design (both aesthetic and functional) say about the culture that makes the buildings. Because how buildings are used in your game tells a story.
Show this thread -
Same with clothes. Character movement. Combat encounter design. Music. Lighting. And again, you don't have to become an expert in all this stuff, but you should *understand the basics*, regardless of what area of creative you work in.
Show this thread - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.