I mean when 99% of them agree on something, yea I assume it’s true. Anti-intellectualism is a cancer on society; when people have dedicated their whole lives to a field, they know better than a layperson.
They literally use data from the National Crime Victim Survey and follow it up. You don’t have to like the group, but the methodology is sound, you can read it on the second to last page. Also “criminal right” are human rights, because they’re still, you know, human beings.
-
-
Do you know what selection bias is? It means victims that don’t share the radical agenda of the survey maker might not bother to respond. Are victims required to provide data? You have academia brain worse than I thought, also you have a fat face and a weak jawline.
-
it’s followed up information from a fucking Department of Justice Survey. My academia brain knows a lot about selection bias, which isn’t really a factor here because they piggybacked off the other study. It would be if they only surveyed CJ reform advocates or something.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.