Come down to my hood. I think you might have a change of heart. You will see first hand the realities of the policies that you probably voted for blindly or under the guise of another name (Prop 47). Jail is the only option if they don’t agree to the help.
-
-
It is people like myself and many of my neighbors that are suffering at the hands of drug addicts, homeless or unhoused, drug dealers, SRO’s residents that serve as terrorists to anyone in their path. They vandalize,crap,piss,litter,ride bikes on sidewalks, smoke crack,shoot up,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the list goes on and on. I got an idea why don’t we let them come to your house and hang out. Maybe Chesa has room? Do you have a room?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jmpentinc @chesaboudin
Or, (and hear me out): we could use the 80k/yr/person we use to lock people up and actually put treatment and housing initiatives.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You clearly are a suburd kid with no first hand knowledge of the system. Keep reading. Arm chair theorist always think they know what’s best.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jmpentinc @chesaboudin
You were the one whose first tweet demanded data. Now you’re getting the data, it’s not my fault you don’t like what it shows
http://www.justicepolicy.org/uploads/justicepolicy/documents/04-01_rep_mdtreatmentorincarceration_ac-dp.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DejectedDan @chesaboudin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
I don’t trust those sources. So spare me. Share it with your criminal justice grad school colleagues so you can cite it in one of your essay assignments. ICE sweeps would reduce San Francisco drug problems. You know what deportation means? That would reduce drug problems in SF.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jmpentinc @chesaboudin
Oh so you DON’T care about data. Sorry, I must have been mistaken based off your first tweet. At least just be intellectually honest and say you have an emotion/values based position, not a data-driven one.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Your data and its sources are not credible enough for me. Indeed I care about data just not lies and misinformation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well 3/4 of the things I provided are peer reviewed from scientific journals, one of which is from the government itself. It’s not a credibility issue, you just aren’t a fan of the conclusions reached. It’s fine to have a values-based position on this, just don’t misrepresent it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.