We disguised this purity issue as a harm/care issue. Let's see if they notice.
-
-
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@DeityOfReligion@sarahdoingthing the vice versa happens too!1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@drethelin That seems to utilize both harm/care and purity—objects tainted by nature of being the result of harm.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@DeityOfReligion@drethelin how about pathogens? in various contexts throughout history2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing @drethelin Blasphemy prohibitions as protecting gods' feelings (harm/care) using the purity axis.
6:20 PM - 24 Jul 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.