The problem with antinatalism/VHEM is that it won't work. Intelligent life will evolve again and again. Suffering until the end of time.
-
-
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch "your utility function is FOOLING you into being happy" hmmm OK1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@GrumplessGrinch (never read much anti-natalism, so that may be an ignorant straw man)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@DeityOfReligion Yeah. My antinatalist stance is roughly that new human lives have negative expected utility *right now, on average*.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@DeityOfReligion There's also a right's-based argument that creating a person requires permission which is (necessarily) unobtainable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GrumplessGrinch
@GrumplessGrinch existing at all is kind of a privilege. But if certain metaphysics are true, all possible people will exist. Moot point.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@DeityOfReligion I don't believe in rights so the the second argument is unconvincing to me. First one, though...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@GrumplessGrinch anti-natali-portman-ism
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.