So environment related randomness has a bigger role in determining personality traits?
-
-
-
That is actually the landmark insight from behavior genetics, I have summed it up here: https://plus.google.com/101046916407340625977/posts/NzThLg3Tz5v …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't the paper say the opposite - no evidence for genetic basis of sex differences in big 5 traits?pic.twitter.com/BvuG6d6ymK
-
Could you correct this tweet
@DegenRolf - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
oh yes, agreebleaness is like the rest of the Big Five a non-additive, frequency dependent selected, distal-to-the-variants mess of a trait, 2/10 would not recommend, but this (can't access even with sci-hub) is a quant genetics study, not a molecular genetics study, no?
-
guess the true test of this is see if genetic correlation between sexes is low in some trait where it would def be expected
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That may be true, but my point was that that's not the conclusion of the study.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you can have less than 1.00 genetic correlation between sexes in contribution for a trait despite male and female autosomal DNA being identical, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
checked hsu's paper but there's no information of between sexes genetic correlation just adjusting for the overall difference for prediction
@hsu_steve halpThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.