Paper urges psychologist not to shout their failed replications from the rooftops, because it makes science look bad. https://psyarxiv.com/8a4h6/ pic.twitter.com/vrn4RBJpm3
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I don't think anybody wants you to tweet just abstracts (that's what journals would be for if they weren't technologically inept for the most part)! I think your excerpts add a lot of value, most of the time, and could add even more.
In this specific case, there is actually a very interesting link between the way the author proposes we communicate replications, and the way you often communicate replications. If anything, I think there is a good take-home message for journalists in this piece.
But they don't nail it. Would be better if they, you or others, proposed an actual protocol for labeling the level of confidence the public should take away from a single study, two studies in agreement, in opposition, etc.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.