Flawed because asking parents opinion of their own children - who don't want to admit or recognize the effects. Parents often use digital screens as a babysitter, pacifier. Flawed because it's not assessing how their children would be after several weeks without screens.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like a good way to discredit large studies
-
Yes it's interesting isn't it? I don't know the details of the paper but it'd be funny if the hype around internet usage was overblown.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What about physiologically? I.e., health, body weight, fitness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Phone interviews w/parents evaluating-come on--REALLY--no bias there(If Udont have a guilt complex try being a parent)let alone possible unconscious guilt driving responses-&exactly what Qs asked?-about behavior inner life-10yrs later(no!)VS immediate/visible impact on 2-5yr-olds
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I saw this, but then I wondered about it as the first author is from the Oxford Internet Institute. Anyone know whether or not this is a relatively unbiased institution? I confess I'm unable to analyze it sufficiently on its scientific merits.
-
I’m sure you could use the Internet to check this & the authors out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
let's wait and see when the longitudinal studies arrive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm simply looking at methodology in light of the body of research and conclusions.
-
I did give you studies...just published and can give you links I never said shut up??? this is not a conversation this is something else
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.