As I see it, there is not even a strong, substantiated theory in the first place, just some smart conjectures.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was thought that these changes were aimed at extramarital sex, but we now know that extra pair fertilizations are very rare in humans and thus unlikely to shape adaptations in behavior.
-
No one is able to love two persons simultaneously./After Freud Here we have one word for 'make sex', but in French, they have two words for sex, which is 'make love'; I mean they make it. (And make it more when they are likely to become pregnant if engaging in sex.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would not be surprised if all effects found so far were based on p-hacking and other forms of statistical wizardry,
-
@UltClassicRock My son, m'avenger Menkheperre long live to you forever https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grSWdLdp7po …pic.twitter.com/tBlBjuPpaP
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But I want to believe it’s true. Shouldn’t that count for something?
-
Can we just say: ”guys, no shortcuts or hacks to get laid, deal with it and carry on”? I think that would save a lot of time to humanity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
HIGHLY motivated reasoning alert!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Key quote: "Results showed an overall preference for bearded over clean-shaven faces at each phase..."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.