The faces of gay men are more feminized and rated as more attractive than those of heterosexual men by both sexes. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918369.2017.1411692 …pic.twitter.com/OtW5cJY9Qa
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Are the only results that are positive in this direction from samples of mostly white people in industrialized nations? Extrapolating from contemporary pops w/ massively reduced fecundity and male variance vs ancestral past is dubious... https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-007-9191-2 …pic.twitter.com/Q3T98WHvcb
Not at all. The effect was also found on Samoa:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-009-9576-5 …
There may be a significant effect, but it is never large enough to outweigh the 0.2 < γ < 0.7 fecundity in HS males. Also the results may be influenced by measuring open and active HS males, which may fully explain the slightly greater fecundity of relatives.
Does no one else suspect that the 0.2 < γ < 0.7 fecundity measures are an artifact of contemporary research that might not have held in more heteronormative cultural environments, say before the 1960s?
Blanchard 2012 is negative result, and the methodology better and the sample size 4784 versus 240 for Campera's clinic !
one negative result for you to see: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22187029
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.