Thread prt 1: the term ‘psychopath’ has a number of issues. It isn’t in the DSM-5 for a reason. (Several actually.) first off, we can’t as a society, or even as a scientific community, decide what the term ‘psychopath’ means. Sure, we have a diagnostic criteria, but that
-
-
-
2:has an enormous amount of caveats too. (I.e. it doesn’t allow for comorbidity) In addition to just being confusing and inaccurate, the term has a lot of unforeseen consequences. Firstly, if psychopathy WERE a clinical diagnosis, it would fall into cluster B. Cluster b
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the freeway, I consider a targeted approach to wiping out those who won't 'zipper' at a merge, but lack the commitment to don gear and lie in wait for the perfect example. Color me psycho.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sexual sadism is their hallmark.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Impulsivity and successfully evading capture don’t go too well together
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why do we lock murderers up when we could just ask them to fill out a questionnaire honestly whether they are going to offend again?
#BadScience -
Subjective science
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe psychopats are simple persons who doesn't dissimulate.
-
[i.e. "normal" people are hard-covering emotionally and murders simply do what they {every one of us} want: to kill our boss or the annoying old men who wakes up in Sundays at 6:30 A.M.].
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.