So morals to someone in a hierarchical relationship with God (to be obeyed or worshipped) means something different than someone in a social relationship (God as helper or counselor.)
-
-
-
Certainly, or at least the morals motivated by that person's relationship with God. I don't think this work proves that, but there is interesting work suggesting that morality *is* relationship-regulation. So the form of that relationship can shape the moral obligations.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for the interest! You might also like this related paper: https://psyarxiv.com/gb5am/ Among morals, some are more objective than others. Objective morals elicit least activity in social brain regions. Objectivity-subjectivity might be less binary, more of a gradient.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
the causation in the conclusion is an example vaguely inferred; true but incomplete from a methaethics pov. self-fulfillment prophecies and progressive rational ethics f.i. also I continue on neutrality. objectivity is as subjective as any definition of subjectivity is objective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.