Actually, men don't need an equivalent to Johnny Depp. They don't need the best. They take the next-best.
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
the good old johnny depp study, misunderstood again https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sexual-personalities/201706/would-you-agree-sex-total-stranger …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
seems an example of
@GarettJones' "Everest Regression" - "controlling for subjective sex appeal, no difference in willingness-to-have-sex"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This finding is somewhat meaningless, as men are simply not very attractive: https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e …pic.twitter.com/qplWjgnOr7
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you have the most interesting and provocative tweets, bar none
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
+ physical attractiveness held equal, men really don't care about "celebrity status" or accolades when making these judgments
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How would one explain away other self-report biases, which can be corrected for w a bogus pipeline technique (Alexander & Fisher, 2003)?pic.twitter.com/L0xLffIBXs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.