seriously? in one review "It’s hard to make THREE errors in two short sentences, especially when the writer is an evolutionary biologist writing about evolution, but that’s what Prum has done"https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/05/08/an-evolutionary-biologist-misrepresents-sexual-selection/ …
-
-
-
The sex appeal of male symmetry is now counted as a prime example of the "decline effect" in a great new book on the reproducibility crisis in psychology.https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/819560512073715717 …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is histocompatibility more likely then?
-
I personally believe now it is not about ANY (hidden) utility. Just l'art pour l'art, as Darwin originally assumed. Read Prum! Damn good!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
S̶e̶t̶t̶l̶e̶d̶ ̶s̶o̶c̶i̶a̶l̶ ̶s̶c̶i̶e̶n̶c̶e̶.̶
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't all science low in reprodicibility?
-
Not a problem in formal sciences. Not as big of a problem in natural sciences as in psychology. The human mind is hard to "observe".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So someone had arbitrarily defined "good genes" only to get that refuted by experiments. D'oh. Good genes are those that propagate, period. Health matters but not too much. If my children from that male will have the same peacock tail that attracts females, he's a good choice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I.e. subjectivity of the scientific method.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just bought this book in BnN last night because I saw this tweet. Read the first chapter. Great read so far!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.