Where is that study freely available?
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@liebermaninfo
@ScottAdamsSays@jordanbpeterson If you adopt the notion that there are only "two sides" to any problem you're already sunk.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is partly bullshit. I don't tune in to right wing media is that I don't want to sit through degradation of race, religion, sexuality
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting. But I don't believe democrats are as anti-science as republicans can be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This seems true by my exposure to both libs and conservatives; it makes me proud to be
#Libertarian - we listen to all shitThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not me! I love to hear their opinions & shit all over them, point out the hypocrisy, the misinformation, & undoubtedly the spelling errors!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This was my criticism of Habermas, at some point you just can't get a point across.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
information bubbles are not a sufficient model. Many ppl start out left or right and then swing eg left atheists who become islamophobic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ScottAdamsSays Some people are constituted such that their OWN minds continually generate multiple explanations for the same data. -
@ScottAdamsSays Some people are better than others at sifting useful versions of what their minds generate from the chaff. They are "smart."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.