but are these normalized for the number of publications in each field...?
-
-
-
The paper seems to be based on a presentation, so it contains little background. But this what it also shows.pic.twitter.com/Erqus9g0KN
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Neuro_Skeptic those numbers don't seem normalized for total number of pubs in each 'category'. So not very compelling, no?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And most of those were from 1 person, right?
-
58 papers retracted according to retraction watch...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Neuro_Skeptic this should be normalized by the number of published articlesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Neuro_Skeptic This should be normalized according to the size of the discipline?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@chengela just an obvious point... this plot is not normalized for total number of publicationsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
nice count data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4th worst is not a great result. . And nearly double 5th place.. also I can think of 3 papers that should be retracted
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.