@pmarca Quantifying the qualitative is doomed for failure. I've seen it in KPIs, metrics, learning outcomes, etc.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DegenRolf Not valid, but "still useful" for managers? Maybe in France, where they use "graphologists" in deciding who to hire.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@pmarca@DegenRolf Prediction: government policy will continue to assume the implicit association test is true.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@pmarca@DegenRolf not really, at least not if you use it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@pmarca So I can stop feeling like a horrible person now? (For IAT stuff, I mean. I’ll keep feeling horrible about everything else, obvi.)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DegenRolf@razibkhan would either of you guys be willing to email me a pdf? jesse.singal@nymag.comThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
@DegenRolf@CHSommers Interesting if true. But methodology can't measure indirect, cultural influence of stereotypes (IAT) on discrimination -
@DegenRolf@CHSommers ...so *aggregate* IATs might indicate stereotypes that influence discrimination via culture. Study can't detect that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.