@DegenRolf The authors of the objectionable paper(s) could argue that this was a social experiment to test the gullibility of academia.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@PolSciReplicate Thanks, nice. Wonder if polsci deserves this rank in the retraction race: https://plus.google.com/101046916407340625977/posts/FdGxGCnykeC …pic.twitter.com/mbKNt1kdg1
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
@DegenRolf Here is the Erratum to the original, faulty paper, issued by the authors:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12216/full … -
@DegenRolf Given http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2016/03/personality-and-politics.html …,@tylercowen might want to take a look at this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DegenRolf @Moral_Community Maybe social science needs the equivalent of double blind studies...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CdotPRATT@DegenRolf@tylercowen Good example of liking what you like. Blame it on the tight genes (hehe)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
@DegenRolf Ironic thing is if they'd had it correct 1st time they'd say libs more apt to be free thinkers & cons dangerous authoritariansThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.