Estimated infected = 1892 and deaths = 7, age range of 78-85 years. This is not representative of other parts of the world e.g. this age group had 25% of the fatalities in NYC.
-
-
-
They say they willfully chose a non representative hot spot, as with an estimated infection rate of 2% in whole Germany, a sample of n=1000 would yield far to few cases to meaningfully infer the fatality rate.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Pretty close to the Heinsberg study with 0.37%... but is it peer reviewed?
-
Is this the same as the Heinsberg study?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You should mention this study's shady ties to certain lobbyists and politicians. When doing so, please mention it is neither peer reviewed yet, nor is its methodology and cohort size valid for projecting upon Germany as a whole or covid-19 in general.
-
Can you explain more about the study's ties to lobbyists and politicians, please? I don't speak German so it's difficult umcovering information about this.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There are many critiques here, the first is that the Prof. doing this hired a PR firm with the right PR before there were nay results. The analysis is about 6 deaths, which makes the n so low the result could be random.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How does one pose a question mark?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ja. Faren var at vi allesammen på rekordtid skulle have en sygdom vi ikke var immune overfor, og som er væsentligt farligere for ældre og udsatte, end lignende sygdomme. Og derved sygehuskapacitets brud.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.