Probably one of the, if not *the*, most important question in science.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder if it correlates with their own size.
-
It does. If it's too big, it hurts, if it's to small ... well, you know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They have to control for ability
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a surprise: people are different! - Anyway, this is like studying knifes and forks as a key element of gastronomy or nutrition science ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
16.3 cm is 6 1/2 inches, that’s pretty respectable and attainable if you lose some body fat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's a lot of words to say it's important to some, and not others. Given variation in women's anatomy, this should surprise no one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now I know what to tell my plastic surgeon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://twitter.com/thehumanxp/status/1242290609374875649?s=21 … May not matter under the
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Serious question: What is the point of this research? If women generally have a particular preference, then what? Will clinical / therapeutic staff be guiding people towards penis surgery or finding a different partner, or (if they want to) stick with the relationship anyway?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.