Where are the actual studies, though? The article says "studies have found ___," and "research finds ____," but doesn't cite any research/studies.
-
-
-
follow the link in the tweethttps://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1127236966347616256?s=20 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
well I can tell you that this is not true for me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Let’s say that Jane is agreeable, and John is antagonistic.” Isn’t this fundamental attribution error right here?
-
See also: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/in-our-time/id73330895?i=1000431751937 … Authenticity has always been a bit of a problem
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Simple translation: people are sheep.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Off the bat, I’d guess this result was baked in to the method.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm afraid the text is inauthentic, research and study words in the text have no reference to (who, where, and when).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Satisfying social needs (belonging, safety, stress management) is psychological authenticity. It ranks acceptance higher than originality as a felt need. Authenticity isn't a differentiating factor, rather it's the most generalized trait. So the opposite of what we think it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.