In the 2018 paper they reference the N for congenital cortical blindness was 66. Given schizophrenia affects ~1/100 people, we would surely expect them to find no cases of schizophrenia in this sample, as they did, simply owing to its small size, not a protective effect...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting for sure! Mental illness is often a response to a world that harshly contradicts what one expects or needs from it. Maybe the less that one directly perceives these contradictions, the easier it is to create a stable inner image or conceptualization of it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now that is a very curious fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting… 1. Base rate low (1 in a million), or 2. Down-bias in diagnosing (SCZ side effects like unemployment leading to intervention already being handled), or 3: Blindness cures schizophrenia via previously unknown mechanism. 1 and 2 seem more likely. 3 = Nobel prize.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@docbhooshan had talked about this yesterday. Very interested finding. Limited data though, as i understand. On similar lines, had an interesting case yesterday. Patient with Profound SNHL almost contemporaneous with Commanding Type of Auditory hallucinations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Most interesting thing I've read in days.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe they just couldn't see that they had it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ojos que no ven...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.