Claims based on a study that purposefully made their methodology horrible. Shor & Seida, 2018 did not assess most popular videos. They said, and this is a real quote: "our initial sample included only the most highly watched videos, leading to relatively low heterogeneity...
-
-
-
..on this measure. We THEREFORE ADDED an additional random sample of videos that received fewer views." The researchers claimed - with absolutely no basis - that porn users are choosing to watch "softer" porn. They picked vids no one watches and claimed the opposite.

End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Current paper's claim about pornographic videos was "supported" only by a solitary paper (Shor & Seida, 2019) that did not assess videos based only on popularity. Many continue to cite this study, yet it's not what it appears to be. Expose' here:https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/critique-of-harder-and-harder-is-mainstream-pornography-becoming-increasingly-violent-and-do-viewers-prefer-violent-content-2018/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's the worst news I've heard all day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.