The free full text manuscript elaborates on the measures.
-
Novi razgovor
-
-
-
Yes, but the top ~5% and the bottom ~3% groups both have higher rates of childlessness. Because the data is categorized, these figures are rather crude, based on the sizes of the categories.pic.twitter.com/PJXxz3UGrk
-
The higher rates at the bottom did not reach significance. The author believes it would have if the number of participants in that group were higher.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Very high intelligence might make a person socially weird?
-
Somewhat. The paper contends that high intelligence correlates to openness to new experiences or the unconventional, with deliberate childlessness being somewhat historically unusual. I would challenge that as greater fertility would be equally unconventional (1/n)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Exeptional minds that never reproduced/married *Voltair *Friedrich Nietzsche *Nikola Tesla *Plato * Sir Isaac Newton *da Vinci *Alan Turing *Antonio Vivaldi Etc
-
Nature wouldn't create something that would out-smart. That's why we don't see too many geniuses walking around in our daily interactions. "As with nature, the more a living thing deviates from the norm, the more a survival disadvantage it becomes"
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The answer to the Fermi Paradox.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
High intelligence is rare, making it harder to find a peer mate. I remember from somewhere I can't find now that relationships are difficult if there is a difference of more than 15 IQ points.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.