I'd be inclined to wait for peer reviewed publications on a matter so subject to ideological controversy. (I can't judge the merits.)
-
-
-
Since the reproducibility crisis, peer review is no longer the arbiter of scientific "truth". Among other measures, early on debate of preprints among knowledgeable readers has become more important, which I invite.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It doesn't mean that. What's with this amateurish, erroneous logic? It almost certainly means that different, rarer variants are different between different lineages but that they've not yet been recognized. This applies to within-population *genetic* differences too.
@gcochran99 -
This is very unlikely given what we know about the distribution of rare variants and their contribution to trait.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
My guess is it’s largely due to a combo of prenatal and childhood nutrition/diet + environmental stressors.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
some misunderstanding of within family and fallacious fst analysispic.twitter.com/TOv7c9P91Q
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Which "Africans"? Africa is the most genetically diverse continent on the planet.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
