Lotsa people talking about porn on the TL recently. Just going to re-up this piece we published back in September, which points out that lot of the claims made about porn's supposed harms are exaggeratedhttps://quillette.com/2019/09/12/anti-pornography-campaigners-pseudo-scientific-treadmill/ …
Meta-analysis: "The findings indicate no difference in the frequency of consuming sexually explicit materials (r = -.05) between criminal sexual offenders and noncriminal controls." https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23808985.1999.11678961 …pic.twitter.com/Q28KE4w1ft
-
-
This study is amazingly flawed on SO many levels.
-
This is not "a study". This is a meta-analysis, which statistically pools the results of all previous studies on the subject.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.