Without preregistration, psychological studies are more likely to turn into fishing expeditions, encouraging the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/brv.12315 …pic.twitter.com/PotQbnRawB
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Without preregistration, psychological studies are more likely to turn into fishing expeditions, encouraging the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/brv.12315 …pic.twitter.com/PotQbnRawB
"Preregistration" should be made compulsory for any publication in a serious scientific journal. I mean, wouldn't that be a (part of) the solution to the replication crisis?
That didn't stop the #PACEtrial authors from doing some quite creative bookkeeping.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331997774_Response_Sharpe_Goldsmith_and_Chalder_fail_to_restore_confidence_in_the_PACE_trial_findings …
So what you're saying is, this needs to be standard practice. Am I right?
Our RR results very much supported our view; we normally might have just written "we found X (p<.001)". Having preregistered tests of opposing view, this became "we found X (p<.001), and not Y (p>.05)". That as a norm + focus on sensitive tests will push rates towards .5.
Weird...
Plenty of professors regularly trained grad students into doctoring hypotheses and re-engineering paper introductions (or waiting to write them until you had results to guide you) in my old program. It was awful! Produced a lot of terrible work that made no sense.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.