saying "key factor" suggests causality, which is too big a thing to claim. interesting nonetheless
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Explains 2% of variance after controls. Failed to control for population size (people generally move to big cities to upwardly mobilize themselves...) Not actionable (let's just rebuild Dallas and LA?). Also didn't control for Hispanics. Social science is still pseudoscience
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Potential factors: a.) Car dependency raises a job’s break-even threshold, affecting choices. b.) Sprawl separates employees from other options — e.g., not as easy to slip away to an interview unnoticed; fewer chance encounters with friends at other firms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure this makes any sense. What is meant by “belonging”. This is doomed to be a self-reporting morass. Why not just say the constraints in mobility led to provincialism about their neighborhood? Too much of this kind of thing is a covert anti-automobile nostalgia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm guessing this isn't only about location access. At least as much about a city being more communal and networked; people can plug in to more people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.